Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Saccades made during memory maintenance prioritize memory for the saccade target, but it is unclear if this benefit is specific to a location or extends across memorized objects. In three experiments, we examined whether saccadic selection spreads to other locations within the same object. In Experiment 1, we asked observers to remember three oriented Gabors presented either within contour-defined objects or without object structure. A subsequent movement cue prompted observers to move their eyes to the indicated location. We then probed memory for stimuli at locations equidistant from the saccade target, in either the same or a different object. Memory was best for stimuli at locations congruent with the saccade target, and consistently weaker for other stimuli presented in the same or a different object than the saccade target. In Experiment 2, we created more complex objects by adding more object features to the stimulus. Again, memory performance was best for stimuli congruent with the saccade target location, whereas memory in incongruent trials was worse and similar for stimuli in the same and different object as the saccade target. In Experiment 3, we tested if saccadic selection is present and propagates within the object in a change detection task. Again, memory performance (i.e., change detection) was best at the saccade target location. However, this memory benefit also spread to other locations within the same object. Our results imply that saccadic selection in visual working memory is primarily space-based but can also spread towards locations within the object where a saccade was directed.

Visual working memory (vWM) is often linked to conscious experience and visual imagery, but it is typically described as a system that stores separate, independent items. These assumptions are difficult to reconcile, given the unified nature of conscious experience. Here, we test the hypothesis that vWM relies on at least two distinct representations: an underlying, unconscious memory trace and a consciously accessible, integrated representation. A total of 216 participants performed a change-detection task, in which they rated their perceptual awareness of the memory display during the maintenance interval. Critically, we manipulated the statistical properties of the displays (average item size and size variability) to probe sensitivity to unified ensemble-level structure. Results revealed a dissociation between subjective and objective measures. Perceptual awareness increased for displays with larger, more variable items, whereas objective performance improved for displays with smaller, less variable items. Despite this difference, subjective awareness still predicted performance, and even incorrect responses showed consistent biases rather than random guesses. Importantly, individual differences in imagery vividness (VVIQ) were selectively associated with subjective awareness and estimation bias, but not with objective correctness. These precision biases were further shaped by display statistics, suggesting that multiple representations can guide behavior. Together, our findings support a reinterpretation of vWM performance in which task responses can draw on both unconscious and consciously accessible representations. One possible explanation for these behavioral patterns is that subjective experience reflects integrated, ensemble-like representations, while objective performance depends more strongly on item-specific information. Public significance statementsWorking memory allows us to temporarily hold and use information, and differences in this ability are closely linked to broader cognitive skills such as intelligence. This study shows that these differences may not depend only on how much information people can store, but also on how they experience it: some individuals appear to rely more on consciously accessible, image-like representations, especially when memory is uncertain or prone to error. By demonstrating that subjective experience and the vividness of imagery can shape behavior independently of objective accuracy, these findings suggest that how we use memory may be as important as how much we can store, with implications for understanding individual differences in cognition.

Goal-directed behavior often requires sustained effort across a sequence of interdependent decisions, yet the determinants of persistence in such contexts remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated how individuals regulate persistence in a novel sequential effort-based task in which they controlled an avatar through successive checkpoints to reach a final goal and could make repeated attempts following failure. At each attempt, participants could choose either to persist in the same task or to disengage toward an easier but less rewarding alternative. We found that decisions to persist or disengage were jointly shaped by multiple interacting factors. Disengagement increased with task difficulty and lower skill level. It also increased with repeated attempts and time-on-task, indexing fatigue, and with accumulated errors, indexing lack of progress. Conversely, proximity to the goal promoted persistence and shaped decision dynamics by reducing choice conflict during persistence decisions and increasing hesitation during disengagement near the goal. Notably, clearing the first checkpoint produced a sharp increase in persistence, suggesting that early success plays a pivotal role. Furthermore, persistence reflected both retrospective and prospective evaluations of effort, with prior investment promoting commitment and anticipated effort reducing it. Finally, disengagement was preceded by short-term performance decline but not by gradual increases in decision conflict, suggesting relatively abrupt strategy shifts following repeated failures. Together, these findings provide a comprehensive account of persistence in sequential effortful tasks, showing that decisions to persist or disengage are jointly shaped by multiple factors related to fatigue, (lack of) progress, goal proximity, and early success.

Response inhibition, the ability to suppress contextually inappropriate actions, is a cornerstone of cognitive control and is commonly assessed using paradigms such as the go/no-go task. However, traditional go/no-go paradigms rely on binary outcomes such as commission errors, which offer limited insight into the dynamic, graded behavioral adjustments underlying successful stopping. The present study developed a novel mouse-tracking go/no-go paradigm with a dynamic start to capture inhibitory processes during ongoing execution. Twenty-three healthy young adults completed the task in two sessions separated by approximately one week to evaluate the test-retest reliability of standard behavioral measures (error rates and reaction times), and three kinematic features: path length, mean velocity, and mean acceleration. Results revealed robust differences between go and no-go trials across all measures. Successful inhibition was characterized by significantly shorter path lengths and reduced mean velocity and acceleration compared to go trials. Critically, all measures demonstrated moderate-to-good test-retest reliability across sessions, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from .75 to .85 for go trials and from .59 to .83 for no-go trials. These findings establish construct validity and psychometric reliability of the current mouse-tracking go/no-go paradigm. The demonstrated stability of these measures provides the methodological foundation for their use in cross-sectional, longitudinal, and intervention research targeting inhibitory control.

Internal forward models predict the sensory consequences of motor commands; however, whether the anticipated availability of post-action feedback contributes to the precision of the action itself remains unknown. We manipulated the predictability of post-release visual occlusion in skilled basketball players. Participants performed three-point shots while wearing liquid-crystal shutter goggles. The study tested three conditions: a no-occlusion baseline, certain-occlusion condition in which players knew that their vision would be occluded at ball release in every trial, and random-occlusion condition in which they could not predict whether an occlusion would occur. Shooting accuracy declined in the certain-occlusion condition relative to the no-occlusion condition (49.2% vs 41.7%). The random-occlusion condition did not differ from the baseline (46.1%). Within the random condition, the accuracy in occluded trials were virtually identical to that in non-occluded trials (46.6% vs 46.2%), even though the immediate visual occlusion was the same as in the certain-occlusion condition. These results demonstrate that it is not the absence of post-action information per se that disrupts motor execution, but the prior certainty that action consequences will be unavailable. We interpret this finding as a prospective influence of anticipated consequence loss, whereby motor execution depends on whether the prediction-outcome loop remains closable.

Human pointing is often used to test whether dogs extract object-specific information from human communicative cues. However, above-chance responses in standard object-choice tasks do not by themselves distinguish between a referential interpretation, in which the gesture identifies a specific target, and an attentional interpretation, in which it primarily biases behaviour toward a broader spatial region. We addressed this issue using an asymmetric six-cup arrangement designed to separate coarse side guidance from exact cup localisation more clearly than a symmetric multi-cup design. Performance in domestic dogs was analysed using three measures: the probability of reaching the correct side, the probability of choosing the correct cup overall, and the probability of choosing the correct cup conditional on having first reached the correct side. The principal comparison involved three matched trial classes: the symmetric 3-vs-3 condition, 2-vs-4 trials with the baited cup on the 2-cup side, and 2-vs-4 trials with the baited cup on the 4-cup side. Descriptively, pointing trials exceeded matched no-point control trials more clearly for side selection than for overall cup choice. The clearest condition effect was observed at the level of side guidance. Dogs were most likely to reach the correct side when the baited cup was located on the 4-cup side of the unequal arrangement. Mixed-effects models confirmed a reliable group effect for side accuracy, whereas overall cup accuracy showed only a weaker and less robust condition effect, and within-side localisation revealed no reliable group difference once condition-specific chance baselines were taken into account. A complementary generative model comparison converged on the same conclusion: a referential-only model fit poorly, an attention-only model captured most of the grouped outcome structure, and a combined model yielded only a modest improvement. Dog point-following is therefore best understood as a layered process dominated by attentional guidance, with only limited additional target-specific localisation.

Summary paragraphA hallmark of learning is the need for sensory stimuli (Ginns, 2015; McGraw et al., 2009; Reinwein, 2012; Spence, 1950) so that learning is fundamentally based on sensory input signals affecting behaviour, physiology, and neurology. If behavioural measures of learning can be causally linked to physiological and neurological variables, a broader understanding of the mechanisms related to learning in schools, learning disabilities, and learning and health issues may emerge (McGraw et al., 2009). Despite decades of research on the physiological/neurological variable of sympathetic activation, learning, and achievement (Horvers et al., 2021), any causal relation remains unclear (Cowley et al., 2014; Mason et al., 2020; Pijeira-Diaz et al., 2016; Sung et al., 2023; Yu et al., 2024) and issues with instrument validation remain (Costantini et al., 2023; Hu et al., 2024; Milstein & Gordon, 2020; Van Der Mee et al., 2021). Here we investigate the effect of sensory input on sympathetic activation by using validated instruments for skin conductance measurement (Batista et al., 2019) and whether sympathetic activation is connected to learning in a cognitive laboratory context and an ecologically valid classroom context. In both contexts, we found a physiological variable which correlated with learning and that sensory input affected this variable while student movement did not. These sensory inputs varied depending on the different instructional activities the students participated in. Together, these findings bring us one step closer to a model linking sensory input to behavioural, physiological, and neurological variables.

When humans learn under conditions of uncertainty, they dynamically adjust how they prepare for and respond to feedback. In navigating uncertain environments, the brain minimizes error by continuously refining internal models via memory updating (MU). Feedback is critical for MU, and anticipatory neural mechanisms shape how feedback is processed, likely reflecting learned environmental certainty. However, the literature has largely focused on post-feedback activity, leaving pre-feedback certainty-related mechanisms less understood. The present study aims to address this gap by examining how certainty modulates anticipatory states, preceding feedback and subsequent MU. We examined oscillatory activity prior to performance feedback in a reanalysis of EEG data previously published by Hassall and colleagues (2023). Twenty-one participants (16 female, Mage = 25.81 years) predicted the strength of cartoon characters with varying predictability levels which were learned through exposure. Feedback on prediction accuracy was presented via an animated rising bar. Results revealed that theta power is modulated by accumulative feedback. Linear mixed-effects models revealed an interaction between predictability-related certainty and learning stage: in late learning, higher performance was associated with increased pre-feedback alpha and beta power for low-certainty trials, whereas in early learning, higher performance was associated with decreased beta power. These learning-related modulations in alpha and beta power suggest that initial learning is marked by adaptable exploratory processing. Subsequent learning exhibited increased alpha-mediated inhibition and beta-related anticipatory activity for lower certainty trials, indicative of dynamic strategy refinement and selective engagement of task-relevant information. These results demonstrate that certainty shapes preparatory oscillatory activity associated with MU.

The willingness to exert cognitive effort is essential but is constrained by the subjective cost of effort. Although effortful tasks are often avoided, positive bias about ones own performance may help sustain engagement with cognitive demands. Here, participants completed an effort-based decision-making task and reported trial-by-trial predictions of their own performance, allowing us to quantify performance prediction error (PPE) as the discrepancy between subjective and objective accuracy. The results showed that PPE was predominantly positive and increased with effort level, indicating greater overestimation under higher cognitive demands. Using a computational model, we show that choices were best explained by a learning model in which rewarded trials accompanied by positive PPE decreased subsequent sensitivity to effort. A confidence-based control model did not provide a better account of choices, suggesting that this effect was better captured by positive performance bias than by confidence alone. Our findings provide a computational account of how biased self-evaluation may attenuate the subjective cost of cognitive effort and extend the positive bias literature to the task need for cognitive effort.

We study how confidence in perceptual decisions depends on whether it is communicated verbally (e.g., "very likely") or numerically (e.g., "80% certainty"). We find that verbal expressions more reliably distinguish correct from incorrect choices than numerical reports, challenging the common assumption that numerical probabilities provide more precise representations of uncertainty. Additionally, in a dyadic decision-making task in which participants can revise their initial reports based on a partners choice and expressed confidence, verbal and numerical reports are equally effective in supporting accurate revisions of initial judgments. Together, these results underscore the effectiveness of verbal expressions as a means of conveying decision confidence.

Mental rotation in 3D is a key cognitive skill involving dynamic spatial transformations, for which pronounced individual differences have been documented. Here we ask whether individual differences in 3D abilities can be explained by analogous differences in 2D abilities. 3D mental-rotation was assessed by the Vandenberg & Kruse Mental Rotation Test (3D-MRT) and examined for association with performance and underlying electrocortical mechanisms during a 2D letter rotation task. Participants (N=40) first completed the MRT and then performed a computerized 2-D letter rotation task in which they had to identify whether letters were oriented in a standard or a mirrored direction (parity judgment) when rotated at 0{degrees}, 60{degrees}, 120{degrees}, and 180{degrees} while EEG was recorded. Reaction times (RTs) and error rates increased with angular disparity. The angular disparity effect on RT was smaller for mirrored letters. Low, relative to high, 3D-MRT scoring participants showed more pronounced accuracy declines at higher rotation angles. An EEG Event Related Potential (ERP) known as the Rotation-Related Negativity (RRN) became more pronounced with increasing angular disparity. High 3D-MRT scores were associated with a stronger RRN response at central-parietal sites. In addition, the ERP-P3b wave was more pronounced at central-parietal sites for low 3D-MRT scorers, independent of angular disparity. It is concluded that 3D rotational ability is positively associated with 2D mental rotation performance, and more strongly with enhanced recruitment of neural visual-spatial cortical representations than with enhanced recruitment of more general cognitive resources.

The present study examined whether thematic reversal anomalies are processed similarly across subject and object experiencer constructions in Malayalam. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded as 30 first-language speakers of Malayalam read transitive sentences with the two types of experiencer verbs, in which the thematic role assignment for the preceding arguments was either correct or reverse. The reversal anomaly became apparent only at the position of the experiencer verb. A linear mixed-models analysis confirmed a biphasic N400-P600 effect at the verb for both verb types when the argument roles were reverse. Thus, our results suggest a uniform processing strategy for TRAs irrespective of the type of experiencer verb involved. However, the N400 amplitude was larger for the object experiencer verb compared to subject experiencer verbs. We suggest that the quantitative difference observed for object experiencer verbs is due to the inverse linking of grammatical function and thematic roles associated with these verbs. In other words, verb-specific linking properties modulate the processing of TRAs involving object experiencer verbs. We argue that this modulation occurs because the parser recalibrates cue weighting when the expected form-to-meaning mappings are overridden by the inverse linking properties of object experiencer verbs.

Evidence suggests that information represented more reliably in neural activity patterns across repeated exposures is more likely to be remembered. However, this relationship varies across category-selective regions of the ventral visual cortex. Specifically, for house stimuli neural reliability has been robustly linked to memory outcomes in the parahippocampal place area (PPA), but less consistently for faces in the fusiform face area (FFA). The reason for this mismatch is unknown. To address this discrepancy, we implemented a novel within-category manipulation by presenting highly face-like and non-face-like house stimuli during fMRI, followed by a memory test. Non-face-like houses were more likely to be remembered than face-like houses. Although face-likeness did not elicit face-selective responses in the FFA, representational reliability in ventral visual cortices, particularly in the FFA, showed an association with individual differences in memory performance. Finally, symmetry emerged as a potential perceptual factor underlying differences in mnemonic outcomes.

Past work has indicated that expectation can modulate neural responses to visual stimuli, but it is unclear whether these effects remain consistent across different types of unexpected stimuli. Here, we measured and compared neural prediction effects associated with semantic category and presentation frequency-based expectations in real-world object stimuli. Participants (n = 35) viewed real-world object images in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) streams. Semantically unexpected stimuli occurred when a stimulus was presented in a semantically incongruent stream. Low-frequency violations occurred when a rarely presented stimulus was displayed in a semantically congruent stream. Multivariate pattern analysis of electroencephalography (EEG) was used to quantify and compare the degree of information represented in neural activity for stimuli in different prediction conditions. Semantically expected stimuli yielded lower decoding accuracy relative to random (unpredictable) stimuli (125-313 ms post-onset) while semantically unexpected stimuli exhibited increased decoding accuracy (199-238 ms & 523-559 ms). Low-frequency violations yielded decoding accuracy which was not significantly different from semantically expected stimuli. Exploratory analyses indicated that dissimilarity between expected and presented stimuli quantified in terms of higher-level stimulus features, but not low-level visual features, modulated the observed neural prediction effects. These results demonstrate that different types of prediction violations have distinct modulatory effects on neural responses, providing novel insight into the neural implementation of predictive processing.

Confirmation bias impacts judgments and decisions across a range of domains including finance, policy and science. Here we examine whether explicitly labelling information as true or false disrupts a core underlying computational mechanism that can generate this pervasive bias - asymmetric learning. Human participants (Study 1: N=47; Study 2: N=57) completed a 2 alternative forced choice (2AFC) task previously used to test for the presence of confirmation bias. Participants made choices between pairs of options that could win or lose money and received either factual or counterfactual feedback after each choice. We introduced a key novel feature into the task - providing explicit cues that signalled to participants whether feedback they had seen was true (verified) or false (debunked). Learning in response to feedback was attenuated under false compared to true labels but was present under both. Fitting participants choices to computational models enabled us to examine how sensitivity to the feedback varied as a function of both the label (true/false) and confirmation (confirmatory/disconfirmatory). This revealed a distinct pattern of learning rates typical of confirmation bias (enhanced learning from positive prediction errors for chosen options and from negative prediction errors for unchosen options) in response to both true and false labels. The findings highlight how confirmation bias plays an important role in the effectiveness of interventions designed to verify true and/or debunk false claims. Verification is less likely to succeed when information disconfirms prior beliefs. Conversely, debunking false claims is unlikely to succeed when the information confirms ones prior beliefs.

Humans comprehend language incrementally, updating the representation of sentence meaning with each incoming word. These updates are guided by the distance between each perceived word and prior expectations--the prediction error. The alignment between large language models (LLMs) and cortical activity inspires the hypothesis that the cortical computation of prediction error is Surface-based, driven by statistical patterns of word form co-occurrence. In contrast, psycholinguistic models propose that prediction error computation is Meaning-based, driven by word semantics. We used polysemic words with ambiguous semantics to distinguish these models: ambiguity would introduce uncertainty into meaning representations and hence the prediction error, if Meaning-based, but would not affect the prediction error, if Surface-based. We examined how ambiguity influenced prediction error signatures in self-paced reading times and magnetoencephalographic (MEG) neural responses during sentence processing. While an LLM-based proxy of prediction error robustly predicted reading times and neural responses to unambiguous words, it failed to predict either under ambiguity. That is, prediction error computation was altered by uncertainty in word meaning, which supports the Meaning-based model and corroborates the essential role of word meaning in predictive language processing. Our findings highlight an important limitation of LLMs as in silico models of the human language faculty.

Iconicity refers to systematic links between word form and meaning. Although evidence for iconicity in natural language continues to grow, its neural basis remains unclear. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA), we examined iconic shape associations of auditory real words and pseudowords. The pseudowords were matched to the real words in phonemic and phonotactic properties, while differing primarily in the absence of learned semantic representations. Participants listened to each item and judged whether it sounded rounded or pointed. Searchlight MVPA revealed significant decoding for both stimulus types. For real words, iconic shape associations were decoded above chance in regions associated with visual and haptic shape processing (left lateral occipital complex and left anterior intraparietal sulcus), visual imagery (bilateral precuneus), phonological processing (bilateral supramarginal gyri), and semantic processing (left middle frontal and right superior frontal gyri). For pseudowords, significant decoding was found in regions associated with multisensory feature organization (right posterior intraparietal sulcus) and language processing (left angular and inferior frontal gyri). Together, these findings provide evidence for neural mechanisms mediating iconic associations, with language-related areas involved for both real words and pseudowords, and visual processing for real words.

Given the limited capacity of working memory (WM), prioritization is essential for efficient information processing. Whether prioritization acts primarily at encoding, or dynamically shapes representations during maintenance, is currently unclear. Here, we employed a two-item delayed-match-to-sample task and compared prioritization conditions in which the testing order of items was either known in advance or not. Behaviorally, prioritization selectively reduced guess rates, without affecting precision. Using multivariate pattern analysis, we decoded stimulus information from EEG voltage and indexed internal attention using alpha-band patterns. Prioritization did not alter decodable representations during encoding. During maintenance, however, prioritization enhanced both voltage-based decodability and alpha power-based decodability for the currently prioritized item. Mediation analyses further indicated that alpha-based attentional signals influenced behavior indirectly, via voltage-based representational strength, which is consistent with the idea that internal attention supports performance by strengthening prioritized representations during memory maintenance. Significance StatementWM is capacity-limited, requiring the prioritization of information most relevant to current task demands. Whether prioritization is established at encoding or emerges during maintenance, and how it improves working memory performance, remains unclear. Comparing conditions with and without advance priority knowledge, we found that prioritization occurred primarily during maintenance rather than encoding. We also found that prioritization improved performance by directing internal attention to prioritized items, strengthening their neural representations and increasing their accessibility. This finding provides insight into the flexibility of working memory in the updating of already-encoded information.

Cognitive maps encode spatial relationships between locations and support flexible navigation. However, how these mental representations form in the absence of visual experience remains unclear. Here, we introduce a multisensory virtual navigation paradigm that allows to track the temporal dynamics of non-visual cognitive map formation. Sixteen early blind (EB), 17 late blind (LB), and 29 sighted controls (SC) learned the layout of a tactile maze. Participants repeatedly performed virtual pointing (estimating directions between locations) and navigation (reaching locations) tasks, which measured cognitive maps across multiple stages of learning. This method also enabled algorithmic inference of cognitive maps, providing insights into how mental distortions are progressively corrected. Although there were no group differences in average navigation performance, EB showed slower knowledge accumulation compared to LB and SC. In addition, both EB and LB had difficulties translating cognitive maps into first-person perspectives, resulting in reduced pointing and cognitive map accuracy. Yet, cognitive map accuracy improved progressively in all groups and a subset of EB and LB achieved expert-level performance with high navigation and pointing precision. In sum, this study provides a scalable framework for tracking alterations in cognitive map formation in blindness and other neurological conditions. Importantly, it demonstrates that cognitive map formation in the absence of vision is experience-dependent and trainable. Spatial disadvantages often observed in EB and LB thus do not reflect cognitive deficits but result from adaptive behavioral strategies constraining the use of allocentric cognitive maps.

A consistent finding across studies with older adults is that they typically perform worse at spatial memory tasks, particularly those conducted in virtual reality and involving novel environments, compared to young adults. While the underlying reasons for this difference remain unclear, some proposed hypotheses include differences in sensory cue integration and cue conflict resolution. Here, we tested older (n = 29) and young adults (n = 28) in immersive and walkable virtual reality using both correctly rendered and illusory hallways to test how visual cues (i.e., an intersection) and self-motion cues are integrated. In the illusory or false-intersection condition, we hypothesized that participants who walked an uncrossed path would merge two disconnected intersections, creating the illusion of a crossed path. The overall accuracy and pointing patterns were similar between young and older adults in both true- and false-intersection conditions. We did find, however, a significant age by condition interaction effect in egocentric pointing variability where older adults showed lower variability in the illusory condition and higher variability in the control condition. At the same time, older adults also drew worse maps for the control condition compared to young adults. However, the pointing error correlated with the accuracy of maps drawn regardless of age, suggesting that the pointing patterns shown by both age groups related to their underlying representations of the paths. Our findings are inconsistent with a global deficit in allocentric navigation or path integration and instead suggest that more subtle differences in strategy use might manifest with age.